On 4/7/06, Michael Sullivan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
   opt-in CAN have these checks and balances though.
i've waited to see if an open submission system would be problematic, and if so, a simple trigger would force a typical member activation process.  but no need yet.

I agree ...  I'm fine with an opt-out system so long as the 'in state' is designed to be in compliance with the license associated with the feed.

I have no problem with people syndicating my stuff.  I put it in a feed for a reason ... HOWEVER, there is still a license attached, thankfully all the information someone would need to stay within the bounds of the license is included in the feed.

I think these checks and balances were just left out on some systems.

--
http://www.DavidMeade.com
feed:   http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed


SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant Individual Use


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to