On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:40:49 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The HTTP "no-cache" header has gained a legal context also. I remember > reading about multiple court cases where this was perpetuated; both in > Canadian and USA court. (I don't have any links, but I'm pretty sure I > read > this, via various court cases, from the EFF website. So if I or someone > else did enough digging, the exact court cases could be found.) Sounds like it's not something that will apply in this case. People are not running their own webservers and a hosting provider like Blip.tv cannot enter a legal agreement through HTTP headers with Veoh. Only the owner of the content can enter a legal agreement. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
