-- Enric
--- In [email protected], Richard BF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >A one to many distribution system that occurs live. This system is
> >quickly dissapearing and being replaced by the many to many
> >distribution system over IP.
>
> I'm going to have to call you on this.
>
> The one to many distribution of television is not quickly
> disappearing, and it is certainly not being replaced by a "many to
> many distribution system over IP".
> Videoblogs (video podcasts, vodcasts etc.) are still one to many
> distribution. From a distribution perspective, there's no real
> difference between it and TV, except that TV is still better quality
> visually, and being free over the airwaves, is a lot easier to
> consume that anything over the Internet. (Especially if you're not a
> white affluent male ;-) )
>
> With the advent of P2P (BitTorrent, Kazaa etc.) there is an
> opportunity to change the delivery infrastructure so that you can
> perhaps download a "video" from multiple locations at once to speed
> up delivery, but it is still one to many as a communications system.
>
> What you're probably trying to say is that amateur video on the
> Internet has the opportunity to create two way communication (not
> distribution), as opposed to the old one way communication of TV.
> However true two way ubiquity is still a long long long way off.
>
> >The fear of television argument is expecting the old model which
> >will soon not exist.
>
> What?
>
> Regards,
> Richard
>
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Use |
| Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
