Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?]

[Jan]

I've been mostly deleting this thread, but the word 'weasely' jumped out at me. You guys aren't stooping to ad hominim attacks are you? 'Cause if you are, I'm gonna stop this car....   Don't make me stop this car, kids...   Going back to deleting.   XO, Jan -- "It isn't done alone. Pay more." http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - movement http://dagnyhemingway.blogspot.com - machinima http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - media http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - literature http://the-hold.blogspot.com - art http://homepage.mac.com/janmclaughlin/loveletter/iMovieTheater26.html - filmmaker ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Watson To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:36 PM Subject: Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?] This seems weasely. Why not admit that it is regulation for the Good Cause of Protecting the Internet from Evil? What is weasely is the idea that the internet is not regulated already. The communications cartel has all kinds of regulations that they are operating under. SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.