of all men to disobey unjust laws.
-- Martin Luther King Jr.
;
--- In [email protected], "Andreas Haugstrup"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What part of "If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you
*may*
> distribute the resulting work *only* under a license identical to this
> one" is unclear to you (emphasis mine)?
>
> And from the legal code:
>
> "You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
> digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this
License,
> a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this
> License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same
> License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5
Japan)."
>
> It is quite clear. If you use materiale from a Share-Alike work (apart
> from Fair Use), you *must* release your work under the exact same
license.
>
> I've been telling you it's stupid, but that's how it is.
>
> - Andreas
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:35:03 +0200, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Though it doesn't look like it "should".
> >
> > - Enric
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Andreas Haugstrup"
> > <solitude@> wrote:
> >>
> >> No, it must be the *same* license.
> >>
> >> - Andreas
> >>
> >> On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:09:26 +0200, Enric <enric@> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I would think the more restrictive includes both: by-nc-sa.
> >> >
> >> > -- Enric
> >> >
> >> > --- In [email protected], "Andreas Haugstrup"
> >> > <solitude@> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, 24 May 2006 21:11:33 +0200, Enric <enric@> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Why can't by-sa be mixed with nc-sa?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because the first stipulates that any new works must be released
> >> > under a
> >> >> by-sa license while the second stipulates that the new work
must be
> >> >> released under a nc-sa license.
> >> >>
> >> >> As the CC page says: "Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or
build
> >> > upon
> >> >> this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a
license
> >> >> identical to this one."
> >> >>
> >> >> If I choose to release my new work under a by-sa license I will be
> >> >> violating the second person's license. If I choose a nc-sa
license I
> >> > will
> >> >> be violating the first person's license.
> >> >>
> >> >> And that's why I don't like Share-Alike licenses. They make
remixing
> >> > hard
> >> >> and/or impossible.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> >> >> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> >> >> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> >> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> >> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Typepad |
| Use | Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
