wrote:
> I don't think there's been much dissenting opinion over what an
> enclosure is on the Microformats list. I've been following there for a
> little over a year and have been pushing for a media microformat. The
> above was simply copied from their wiki.
I dissented for a while, but it was over semantics (ahaha. Thank you,
thank you. I will be here all week). In reality there has hardly been any
talk about relEnclosure because it is both simple and well-defined.
> That's not exactly the Microformat process - its defined pretty well
> on their wiki:
> <http://microformats.org/wiki/process>
>
> Probably best to start there and then propose it on their mailing list
> after doing more research and documentation.
+1
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
<URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Typepad |
| Use | Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
