Am not inspired by the concept in the least. Pay $5 in order to maybe get $10? I don't think so.
Robin Hood works if Met Life is the sponsor. If Met Life is the sponsor, then folks don't have to pay to enter. Glenda the Good Witch would work as wish-granting icon, but she's copyrighted. Year-round-Santa? Perpetual Santa? Good luck, though, I support the idea of making wishes come true wholeeartedly $10 wishes will be difficult to come by. Hot dogs & sodas for me and two friends, please. Jan P.S. Were you to type in the whole http address one could just click it in the email. http://www.robinhoodfund.com - like so. On 12/14/06, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Nox Dineen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I recently started working at an Internet startup that is looking to > create > > a video website based around the concept of people submitting wishes in > > video format, and then granting the wishes with the most votes on a > weekly > > or monthly basis. The site is at www.robinhoodfund.com (although we're > > considering moving away from the Robin Hood theme), and quite frankly I > hate > > it. It's ugly, user hostile and doesn't exactly prompt immediate action. > > I agree that "Robin Hood" is a poor choice for something like this. :D The > idea is a good one, > but "Robin Hood" implies strongarming funds from one person in order to > give them to > another person. The question then is "who's getting strongarmed?" and "why > do they > 'deserve' to lose out so someone else can benefit?" > > Tell whomever thought that up to watch the movie again and pick a > different hero. :D > > -- > Bill C. > http://ems.blip.tv > > > -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
