On 1/3/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im using this great article from wethemedia during the Veoh incident: > http://wearethemedia.com/2006/04/08/whats-going-on-with-veoh/ > > "There is, incidentally, a protocol for Web-based aggregation of video > content."
Here are two other protocols for web-based aggregation of video content: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt Here is an explanation of that protocol at a hight level: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/deeplinking.html Here is a quote from that explanation: "This issue is important because attempts to limit deep linking are in fact risky for two reasons: 1. The policy is at risk of failure. The Web is so large that any policy enforcement requires considerable automated support from software to be practical. Since a deep link looks like any other link to Web software, such automated support is not practical. 2. The Web is at the risk of damage. The hypertext architecture of the Web has brought substantial benefits to the world at large. The onset of legislation and litigation based on confusion between identification and access has the potential to impair the future development of the Web."
