No, existing standard cover this space sufficiently. There is no need for creating a new standard. The problem is not a lack of a standard but lack of support (intentional or not) for existing standards in services (and lack of use of existing standards by creators).
- Andreas Den 06.01.2007 kl. 02:53 skrev Kath O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ahh. namespaces. for extending rss spec. > is that an option - for blip or the videoblogging community to define > it's > own namespaces then work with other aggregators so they support them > also? > > http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification#extendingRss > http://www.disobey.com/detergent/2002/extendingrss2/ > > > > On 1/6/07, Kath O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> have an opt-out also for users to opt out of whole sites eg heavy >> opt-out="heavy.com" >> >> >> On 1/6/07, Kath O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > you almost need a 'taste' attribute with an opt-in override (user >> based >> > in addition to site) in the rss feed that the user/creator can fillin >> when >> > they post their work &/or as a sitewide option (so if u added another >> optin >> > u wouldn't need to go back an update all the existing postings) >> > licence= +non_commercial +non_dating_site +opt-in="fireant" >> > +opt-in="itunes" >> > >> > >> > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
