ok, "can take down YT" did confuse me. still does. but ok. On 1/29/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Keep in mind that in terms of centralization, blip.tv is > > behind YouTube. > > > It's in our best interests to encourage a huge crop of > > carrier-neutral > > > aggregators which, with content from hosting sites like > > blip, can take > > > down YT. Our interests are aligned here. > > > > This is not about "taking down YT" either, mike. > > At this point, it is probably not even feasible... as google > > can let it live forever if they want. > > > > Are you suggesting the the "carrier-neutral" aggregators > > should exclude Youtube? > > That wouldnt be very neutral. > > I'm suggesting no such thing, Sull. They should include everyone and be > truly neutral. I think you misunderstand me. I'm agreeing with Lucas > that aggregators are incredibly important so that content creators can > get their content in front of lots of eyeballs without having to go > through a major player, whether that be YT or blip or someone else. > >
-- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
