Nothing stopping YouTubers from putting a cc license in and around their works. We don't NEED to have point-of-upload cc options to claim 'em.
Do we? Naw. Jan On 1/29/07, Melissa Gira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To push the union metaphor to where it'll probably break, where are > the YouTube videobloggers when it comes to CC, then, if they don't > have a way to opt-in built-in? That scene is more like '68 style > Situationist student uprising than any worker's factory floor. > There's room for coooperation there, though, in facing the corporate > heads. > > (Or maybe I just need a drink, Schlomo.) > > Melissa > > On Jan 29, 2007, at 1:38 PM, schlomo rabinowitz wrote: > > > I think it's both. Right now it feels more like an experiement, but > > it could be something grand. > > > > It's almost like all of us work in a big factory and are trying to > > start a union. Maybe we need a Jimmy Hoffa on our side to bust some > > corporate heads into submission (though that doesnt always work...) > > > > Schlomo > > http://schlomolog.blogspot.com > > http://hatfactory.net > > http://evilvlog.com > > > > > > > > On 1/29/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> is Creative Commons a noble experiment, or is it a real tool to help > >> create a healthy online ecology? > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
