> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay dedman > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk & our cc licences > > > I don't think the issue is advertising. If it was there > wouldn't be an issue since ads with video is now fairly > commoditized technology. I think the bigger issue is credit > and respect for the terms of the cc license itself, which can > put restrictions on commercial use and require proper attribution. > > In terms of videoronk my concern is that credit is given > to blip but not to the content creator. > > mike, tech question: > in Blip's feed...does it show the permalink of the Blip page > with my video? > does it list that I am the creator and my website URL?
Yes, all of that information is in the feed. It includes the permalink to the post on blip in the item:link element, and also includes special metadata that's presently unique to blip for credit. Here's an example from a random video I picked on blip: <blip:user>thatphoneguy</blip:user> <blip:show>30 Seconds with Phone Guy</blip:show> <blip:showpage>http://thatphoneguy.blip.tv/</blip:showpage> <blip:picture>http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/user_photo_thatphoneguy746.jp g</blip:picture> So that tells the aggregator that the video is from the "30 Seconds with Phone Guy" series, which can be found at http://thatphoneguy.blip.tv/. It even gives the aggregator a picture that can be used to represent the series, which can be found at http://blip.tv/uploadedFiles/user_photo_thatphoneguy746.jpg. We'd love to use standard elements for these pieces of metadata, but they don't exist yet -- we're including them in our own namespace right now so that our formal partners can pick up and use the data for attribution purposes.
