Yeah, we do point to the Creative Commons license using their CC namespace. Can we go further than that? Is there a standard for conveying the substance of the attribution requirement in RSS?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk & our cc licences Den 31.01.2007 kl. 23:48 skrev Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Andreas, what should we be doing in our RSS? I was thinking about the Creatice Commons namespace. You guys are already using that so those who subscribe to RSS feeds from blip are already getting that information. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > Yahoo! Groups Links
