There's a <copyright> element in RSS 2.0, but that's a human-readable string and not really useful for machines. If you want machines to read the license info the CC namespace seems to be the way to go. It doesn't help that <copyright> is a channel-level element so it's completely useless in many cases.
- Andreas Den 01.02.2007 kl. 00:01 skrev Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yeah, we do point to the Creative Commons license using their CC > namespace. Can we go further than that? Is there a standard for > conveying the substance of the attribution requirement in RSS? > > -----Original Message----- > From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Haugstrup > Pedersen > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:00 PM > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk & our cc licences > > Den 31.01.2007 kl. 23:48 skrev Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Andreas, what should we be doing in our RSS? > > I was thinking about the Creatice Commons namespace. You guys are > already > using that so those who subscribe to RSS feeds from blip are already > getting that information. > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
