Good question; I think I'll vlog it today!

Meanwhile. I love knowing the data about the huge percentage of
watchers as compared to inter-actors. And it makes sense when I
observe my own behavior - I LOVE to interact, and yet I don't comment
on most of what I read or watch. I would stop if I felt pressure to
respond.

So as one who delivers content, my intent is to release my audience
from having to comment. "No pressure" - as Beach Walks is in large
part about de-stressing. When people do comment, I am thrilled. When
they email me, I am more thrilled. When they take time to fill out a
survey, I am ecstatic!

It took me a while to get confident in this early on - as so many have
stated here what we are doing takes time and effort and cash of
varying amounts. I try to focus on what I am getting out of it, and
letting that feed me. I learned some bad habits around "give to get"
and really want to stay away from that. Instead, I focus on making it
easy for them to interact (and want to do a lot more) but once I've
posted the show - It's out of my hands.

So far, so good!

aloha,

rox

On 2/10/07, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "T Shey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > When asked about this once, Ze Frank was quick to say that it's only a
>  > very small percentage of his audience -- a fringe, really -- who
>  > interact with the show. But it's enough to be a really vibrant part
>  > -- and it ebbs and flows who participates, and he really cultivates
>  > it.
>
>  That makes sense. Ze Frank gets enough traffic that the small
>  percentage of viewers who interact end up making a large enough group
>  to create activities and contests with... like this, from the wiki:
>
>  =====
>
>  http://www.zefrank.com/thewiki/the_show_with_zefrank
>
>  Power Moves
>
>  Main article: Power Move
>
>  Sports Racers are encouraged to develop and submit Power Moves (often,
>  but not necessarily, a short martial arts-like movement), some of
>  which Ze will occasionally showcase during the show. A sports racer
>  with an awesome power move is sometimes given a "sports racer name"
>  which - presumably - means induction into The League of Awesomeness.
>  Ze's own Power Move, Thunderclaw, is a simple but graceful maneuver
>  that he demonstrated in his April 6, 2006 episode.
>
>  Ze continues to showcase power moves submitted by viewers, betraying
>  an underlying feeling of compassion for those brave enough to subject
>  themselves to international ridicule.
>
>  See also:
>
>  * List of Power Moves
>  * Sports Racer Power Move Gallery
>
>  =====
>
>  --
>  Bill C.
>  http://ReelSolid.TV
>
>  > The thing that I really like about this medium is the opportunity
>  > to work the audience in more. That said, it's not unique to
>  > vlogging... the Colbert Report uses some of the best tricks, too.
>  > (more here if interested:
>  >
> http://blog.nextnewnetworks.com/index.php/2006/12/13/an-evening-with-the-colbert-report/
>  > )
>  >
>  > Sometimes it's just your friends, or the real nuts, who comment or
>  > send things in at first... but the people like Rocketboom and Jet Set
>  > and Ze who have worked them into a big part of what they're doing
>  > usually find it builds up. We don't get many comments on Frederator
>  > and VOD Cars -- people still usually use the 800-number and email to
>  > talk to us, and they're a definite minority every time -- but when we
>  > saw all those people come to our party last month, we realized they
>  > really were out there. A lot of people just like to watch.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On 2/10/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > Study Ze Frank.
>  > >
>  > > J
>  > >
>  > > On 2/9/07, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > > --- In [email protected], "bestdamntechshow"
>  > > > <bestdamntechshow@> wrote:
>  > > > >
>  > > > > how do all of you feel about the user feedback that you get?
>  is it
>  > > > > enough (like there is such thing as enough), or are you
>  concerned that
>  > > > > people are just watching and not getting involved.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > how do we turn that trend around? what type of tools do we
>  need to
>  > > > > really break the wall down and gain one on one relationships
>  with the
>  > > > > people who watch our videos?
>  > > > >
>  > > > > _drew
>  > > > > www.pluggd.com
>  > > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > That's an interesting question. I think we have to start out
>  with the
>  > > > understanding that anywhere you go on the net, there are WAY more
>  > > > lurkers than posters. I think I read somewhere that the circulation
>  > > > for this list is something like 2500, and there aren't even 30
>  people
>  > > > that post on a regular basis. Even if you try to make a claim that
>  > > > there are 100 people that post, it's still a horrible ratio. I
>  would
>  > > > suspect that the relationship between hits on a site and comments
>  > > > won't be changing any time soon without some sort of
>  restructuring of
>  > > > the blogs themselves.
>  > > >
>  > > > On top of that, I think a lot of blogs are closed-ended, by which I
>  > > > mean there really isn't anything in them that calls for
>  discussion or
>  > > > debate. It just IS what it IS. I'll watch Scriggity to see
>  Shauna's
>  > > > antics, and I'll watch it to see your editing. By the end of the
>  > > > show, I feel a statement was made, and I watched the expression of
>  > > > that statement, and I don't have anything to say about it.
>  There are
>  > > > other shows, like this one about a chick that lies to every guy she
>  > > > ever meets and then wonders why she can't get a decent guy, where I
>  > > > don't have anything POSITIVE to say, so I just skip it. :D
>  > > >
>  > > > Increasing viewer feedback is a tall order for both of those
>  reasons.
>  > > > The video itself would have to prompt discussion, and then the
>  > > > viewers would have to actually participate... most of whom are
>  > > > lurkers, who don't participate practically by decree. This is
>  why our
>  > > > friends inside YouTube have so many hits. The culture over there is
>  > > > to watch something and then comment on it and then tell your friends
>  > > > or your groups about it and have them comment on it as well. Now,
>  > > > they have video comments, so by commenting, you're creating another
>  > > > branch that's going to spawn the same type of responses. Also, the
>  > > > whole "I'm sitting in my room in front of my webcam with nothing
>  > > > better to do than make videos for YouTube" mentality is a sort
>  of "cry
>  > > > for help". It begs for someone to respond to it, and other people
>  > > > sitting in their rooms in Arkansas with a webcam can empathize with
>  > > > them and feel the desire to respond. That won't happen outside of
>  > > > social sites, because there's no community like that. It's like
>  David
>  > > > said, it's random viewers pressing random buttons and very seldom
>  > > > latching on to anything.
>  > > >
>  > > > I think Zadi & Steve have some good ideas @ JetSetShow, like having
>  > > > their viewers send in items that they actually use on the web site.
>  > > > I'm sure it makes the viewers feel like they can be a part of
>  the show
>  > > > instead of just watching it. Actually, the whole format of
>  their show
>  > > > invites teens to get involved and make media, either for their own
>  > > > purposes or to submit to JetSetShow for possible 'airing'.
>  > > >
>  > > > --
>  > > > Bill C.
>  > > > http://ReelSolid.TV
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > The Faux Press - better than real
>  > > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > ---------------------------------------
>  > Tim Shey
>  >
>  > http://nextnewnetworks.com/
>  > http://shey.net/
>  >
>
>
>
>  


-- 
Roxanne Darling
"o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian
808-384-5554

http://www.beachwalks.tv
http://www.barefeetshop.com
http://www.barefeetstudios.com
http://www.inthetransition.com

Reply via email to