Hi,

Just so you know, whenever someone watches a videoblog in the TVTonic
interface, there will be a prominent link to your homepage (specifically the
link URL specified for that item in your RSS).

Sincerely,

Andre Sala
TVTonic Team

On 2/9/07, J. Rhett Aultman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   It makes me feel good to hear this. I often feel like, when I just ask
> people to email us or to friend us on MySpace, that I'm screaming into the
> void. I know I have an audience, because FeedBurner stats show the
> subscribers.
>
> I also, as far as I can tell, have never grown my audience through word of
> mouth from one viewer to the next. Early stats on Google Analytics show
> that most people who visit the website are new users who don't come from a
> search engine or directory. So, we're winning viewers largely by getting
> our URL directly in new hands. This all runs curiously contrary to how I
> thought things would go. Yes...Freetime is still just a toddler of a
> vlog, but I somehow expected the viral effect would be in stronger force.
>
> I think part of it's content, too, though. I've noticed on LiveJournal,
> friends of mine with the largest friends list are generally quite
> controversial. They give people something to argue about. I'm beginning
> to wonder if vlogs that don't give people a reason to regularly pound
> their keyboards in discussion just don't fan out. I see similar things
> happening in text blogs.
>
> Also, I wonder if the aggregator makes a difference. A lot of my audience
> comes from TV Tonic, and I didn't see ways for people to access comments,
> leave reviews, etc, using the TV Tonic software.
>
> --
> Rhett.
> http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime
>
> > Speaking only from my own experience, it's a very small minority of
> > viewers who comment and interact. On one of my shows I developed an
> > extremely active, interested and vocal audience who have created a
> > project inspired by my efforts and tangential to it. They remain a
> > minority of my audience, however.
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to