I think there are plenty of reasons to have another one. For one how much has changed in just 9 months. It has exploded...that and the fact is that you still need as human beings to connect with other people outside your "sphere" of influance.
Personaly I would just like to meet other vloggers face to face....I have been doing this for a year now and still have not yet had the opportunity to meet anyone. There is much to celebrate I think... Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In [email protected], "schlomo rabinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think some of the stuff from the last vloggercon still is applicable today: > > How tos > Net Neutrality > Digital Divide > Get Togethers > Distributed Collaboration > Futurist Brainstorming Sessions > Video Vertigo Summit > Money Makin', Makin' Bacon > ... and that's just off the top of my head. > > I know you and Jay keep saying that you dont see a reason to have one > yet, but I still disagree...and that's coming from someone who put a > lot of work into the last one; I understand what an undertaking it is > to create a two-day event (if it'll even be a two-day event next > time). There is much to discuss. And even more to celebrate! > > One thing I kept fighting against last time is how Yahoo-centric it > was; today it will be much easier to bring in perspectives from all > over the web. From the youtubers to Corporate (like NPR and NYT) > those who go it alone. This is the main reason why I want to do it. > I'm selfish: I just want to talk to these other folks and all they > need is a reason to come over. > > Anyway, that's my two cents.. > > Schlomo > http://schlomolog.blogspot.com > http://webshots.com/is/spotlight > http://hatfactory.net > http://evilvlog.com > > > On 2/22/07, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What are people thinking they'd like do at another vloggercon aside from > > meet and hang out (which is a given!)? What developments in the last 9 > > months do you want to see addressed? What wasn't addressed last time that > > should have been? Basically I'm trying to steer the conversation from when > > and where to why. >
