The part that fascinates is how so many people willingly submit to that 
competitive 
machine is all. Today's youth and all. Heh.

Oh, and I never published muched to Everyday Films, in fact, I haven't vlogged 
in half a 
year, nor done a podcast. So most feeds aside from blog are dead (it's all a 
universal feed, 
same url for everything)

ER

--- In [email protected], Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
> 
> At the risk of repeating myself, I agree that the strength of YouTube  
> is to have a place where you can have an audience and be seen.  I  
> also agree that that has the potential for great power.  And I'm not  
> rejecting YouTube on principle, or because I'm particularly  
> ideologically driven to have my own site, or so full of  
> 'individuality and wanting something better'.
> 
> All the strengths you mention are great, but are all undercut for me  
> by the competitiveness at the center of YouTube - the ratings and  
> number of views, comments, honours, number of times honoured and  
> favourited.  It drags my videos into being watched in the context of  
> how successful they've been, when all I want is to put some video up  
> there to be watched by some random people in unexpected places around  
> the world - to put the video at the center, not wrapped around by all  
> these judgements that interfere with the viewer's perception and my  
> enjoyment.
> 
> On YouTube a few hundred views feels like a very, very different  
> thing to on a blog.  It's my gift to strangers, and I don't have to  
> care if they don't like it.  Even with a couple of hundred views, and  
> without really trying, I'm reaching out further I ever did when i  
> used to show my 'proper' shorts at short film festivals.
> 
> What slightly depresses me is that there'll be lots of people out  
> there like me who just feel inspired every so often to film and edit  
> something and put it out there, who will find their engagement with  
> an audience all screwed up by YouTube's tone, and then they'll think  
> "Publishing on the internet is horrible" because all they've heard  
> about is YouTube, and they'll stop and never do it again.  When they  
> could have had a very different non-competitive experience and made  
> their world a tiny bit happier and better.  It's turning Online Video  
> into high school rules.  Ugh.
> 
> I don't really want to make money from it, mostly because I want to  
> be free to put up whatever I want without worrying about alienating  
> my regular large audience or drawing "BORING" and "YOU SUCK"  
> comments, and so growing and sustaining large audience numbers are  
> not important to me.  Most people who post on YouTube would never  
> make money from it (whatever its competitive/popularity focus might  
> lead them to hope at first).
> 
> Glad you're getting paid to vlog, though, and enjoying it.  Always  
> liked your vlogs whenever I've seen them.  I'm subscribed to Everyday  
> films with Eric Rice, but I guess it's wrong feed cos I'm not getting  
> anything through it.
> 
> Rupert
> 
> http://www.fatgirlinohio.org
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/fatgirlinohio/
> 
> On 5 Mar 2007, at 08:35, Eric Rice wrote:
> Yeah, we can argue about individuality and wanting something better  
> until the cows come home. Also, the expressive, personal, non- 
> promotional crowd might not be one of the best to ask this to...
> 
> Being part of a 'place' where you have an audience and can be seen?  
> Ewww, stinky answer.
> 
> I'd be curious if anyone who is a regular YouTuber even cares about  
> people going to their own site? Or, maybe contextually, their  
> myspace? And even then, everyone else is there.
> 
> And ah, yes, the comments. Get popular enough or cover something that  
> has a wide
> appeal, and the comments, that concentric circle 'conversation' (ask  
> Amanda about that) gets vicious.
> 
> YouTube represents the flipside-- it's the mass reality of everday  
> people fitting snugly into that mode that the idealist inside of us  
> despises. It slapped RSS in the face, by debunking our ideals of  
> 'ohhh i wanna take it wiiiith meeeeee'. Apparently, that didn't seem  
> to be the case for a little part of the population.
> 
> So, we ignore it, we embrace it, or we lock and load and pull on some  
> iron fists.
> 
> It's more anarchy than democracy, but hey, both movements can have  
> little flags and
> berets.
> 
> Power!
> 
> ER
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Peter Van Dijck"  
> <petervandijck@> wrote:
>  >
>  > I've always been interested in why young people prefer to post on
>  > youtube & myspace versus on their own (video)blog (for the  
> comments of
>  > course!) - in this group we seem to think having your own vlog is  
> much
>  > superior.
>  >
>  > But today I realized: my photos are on flickr, instead of having my
>  > own instance of some opensource script like Gallery - for the
>  > community aspect (and the superior functionality), so isn't that the
>  > same?
>  >
>  > Just a thought.
>  > P
>  >
>  > --
>  > Find 10000s of videoblogs and podcasts at http://mefeedia.com
>  > my blog: http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/
>  > my job: http://petervandijck.net
>  >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to