This is another example why I, and a growing number of people (citation needed), don't turn to Wikipedia for information (NPOV). You never know what is going to be written at any given time. And, it's far too easy for one person with an agenda and too much time on their hands to keep messing with an article to the point where many people get caught up in trying to correct it. To me Wikipedia is like some arcane religion full of obscure terms, esoteric texts and a blind obedience to the rules. Some of the discussion pages, and the one for Vlog is a perfect example (weasel words), remind me of the arguments about how many angels dance on the head of a pin. Well, they don't really remind me. I wasn't there; I'm not that old! Anyways, I have this image of crotchety old men pointing their gnarled fingers at dusty old books while arguing about whether or not the Fifth Book of Obfuscation requires a period (full stop for you British blokes) to fall inside or outside of a closing quote. All the best, Tom (who stopped editing on Wikipedia years ago) aka Irish Hermit _____
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan McLaughlin Sent: Sunday, 29 April, 2007 9:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [videoblogging] Video Blog Wikipedia Entry Has rather been decimated. Wow. Anybody? http://en.wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlog> .org/wiki/Vlog Jan -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress. <http://fauxpress.blogspot.com> blogspot.com http://twitter. <http://twitter.com/fauxpress> com/fauxpress [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
