Yeah, sorry. I didn't actually mean not researched at all. Delete me! :) R
On 1 May 2007, at 12:12, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: Den 01.05.2007 kl. 12:17 skrev Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The power of deletion is one of the most powerful of all for someone > like this to hold. It's dispiriting, and it kills discussion. It's > a disaster in a scenario like this, where there are different > opinions on a concrete subject that has not been academically > researched. Videoblogs have been researched, not by many, but they there. At the very least there is a lot of blog research that can be applied without too many issues. Back in 2005 I did a short, short list which includes a couple of vlog papers <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/archives/20051111-1530/ > In our own community alone we have Adrian Miles (and the rest of the RMIT crew, you know who you are), Trine Berry, Richard Hall, Kristoffer Gansing plus the large group of grad students (too many to count, but they're very smart. I know because I'm one). I approve all the members on the vlogtheory group so I know for a fact there are many in the academics who either work with vlogs or are interested in working with vlogs in the future. I think the issue is that those who are involved in research are not interested in the wikipedia article and who can blame them when everything gets deleted en masse? My own reason for not getting involved is that the Neutral Point of View policy more often than not gets interrpreted as No Point of View and I don't have time for that crap (See <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/archives/20061028-2354/ > ). -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
