Yep, I'd suggest Blip or Podtech.

Robyn

On 5/21/07, schlomo rabinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Why dont you contact someone like blip.tv re: white labelling? I think
> that
> if they can create a way for CNN to handle their content, they should be
> able to help you effectively.
>
> Also, there are other companies that do white labelling as well, such as
> Revver.
>
> Sounds like what you need is not a free service, but a robust customizable
> one. Contact these companies and I imagine they have something you can
> use.
>
> Schlomo
> http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
> http://weknowhow.tv
> http://winkshow.com
> http://hatfactory.net
>
>
> On 5/21/07, Mark Westin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <throbbingcow%40yahoo.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks -
> >
> > I'm wondering if anyone here can offer me suggestions on applications
> > or interfaces on a slightly larger scale than the average videoblog.
> >
> > The company I work for has a huge amount of video content on the web,
> > and we're trying to upgrade and increase the usability and efficiency
> > of our website.
> >
> > I know this is sorta off topic for this group, but in a nutshell what
> > I'm talking about is a high-end corporate videoblog - but it just
> > can't look like a Wordpress or blip page. (No disrespect to them - I
> > personally use and love both.)
> >
> > Currently we're hosted by an outside company whose interface lives
> > within our site, but it's clunky - kinda ugly, confusing navigation,
> > player doesn't look cool, encode and upload specs are narrow and video
> > quality is unsatisfying.
> >
> > Our content includes graphics that require fullscreen viewing so we're
> > aiming for the highest resolution possible at the smallest file size.
> > We're shooting DV in a professionally lit studio, cutting on Avid and
> > Sorenson squeezing.
> >
> > Here's what we need:
> >
> > 1. A host that can handle a large archive and hopefully can help us
> > migrate smoothly.
> > 2. Ease of posting (so non-tech employees can do it)
> > 3. Embeddable player
> > 4. Customizable and searchable interface (not just a player on a
> > page) that can integrate seamlessly into our website with no external
> > branding
> >
> > Obviously, we can spend some money on this endeavor. We're in a
> > corporate environment so whoever we work with has to be an above-board
> > solution provider with a track record and some substance - my bosses
> > are tech savvy but leery of anything that's in beta or seems to be
> > flash in the pan.
> >
> > If you're still reading and have any thoughts on this, email me at
> > throbbingcow AT yahoo dot com. Many thanks,
> > MW
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to