Or! Do you have the flexibility to offer the sponsor their choice depending on what works best for them?
On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Bill Cammack wrote: > I don't have anything to add to this thread, but wanted to say that > for people that are planning to monetize their podcasts, this is > something important to think about as far as what you're offering your > sponsors. Are you having them pay you once to permanently be a part > of that particular show that you released, or are you having them pay > to be seen on this particular release of a video at this particular > time. > > -- > Bill > BillCammack.com > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Kent Nichols" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Drew" <andrew@> wrote: > > > > >So if you are all cool with distributing in RSS to iTunes and Miro, > > why not distribute > > > onto YouTube and Metacafe too? While there is so much gain to > be had > > from this, what are > > > the negatives to distributing your work on Youtube that Im > missing? > > > > Because I serve a fresh ad, and get fresh dollars every time someone > > downloads from me rather than YouTube. With YouTube, et. al. you > burn > > in an ad for the duration of that video. That's dead money. > > > > Your show is different since there is an inherent freshness of a > daily > > show, Ninja is more evergreen. We can and do repeat episodes and get > > positive responses. > > > > -Kent, askaninja.com > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
