Bill - does that size make it back through itunes onto an ipod? I thought
ipod compatible videos had a smaller kbps cap, like around 6-700?

David

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   I use a mac. I don't know it that makes instructions different from a
> PC. I've never clicked anything that says "low complexity". When you
> get to the selection area, "Main" is selected by default. I click
> "Baseline" and that's it. From FCP, for instance:
>
> Export to Mpeg4
> Compression: h.264
> 640x360
> 1400 kbps
> 30 fps (or 24, depending)
> Select "Baseline"
>
> Also, check out http://www.freevlog.org/ for their tutorials.
>
> Bill
> http://BillCammack.com
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> WWWhatsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I've been happily using QT Pro on the PC to convert 4:3 DV into
> iPod-compatible 320x240 baseline
> > h.264 @ 608kpbs ever since the the first video iPod was introduced.
> Now I've been persuaded to start
> > shooting 16:9 and I'm wondering how to best to encode it for iPod. A
> couple of things puzzle me.
> >
> > 1) I note that in the spec
> http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/podcaststechspecs.html it gives the
> newer option:
> > H.264 video, up to 1.5 Mbps, 640 x 480, 30 frames per sec.,
> Low-Complexity version of the Baseline Profile
> > with AAC-LC audio up to 160 kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v,
> .mp4, and .mov file formats
> >
> > However the h.264 options in QT Pro only give 'baseline' or 'main'
> but no 'low-complexity'?
> >
> > 2) Googling around I see some mention of 640x352 as being the
> optimum size for 16:9 - why not 640x360?
> >
> > All advice appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Joly
> >
> > punkcast.com
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > WWWhatsup NYC
> > http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
David King
davidleeking.com - blog
http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to