Brilliant idea Ron! That would be very doable, I'm sure! *she says before she asks her tech person...who probably has a voodoo doll with my face on it at this point* ;-)
I always think our tech guys can do anything. lol Sheila --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can anyone write up a spreadsheet that can take stats exported from blip and compute this? > > Export, Download, import and Presto! > > How cool would that be? > > That would be sweet! > > Cheers, > Ron > > > On Friday, April 04, 2008, at 02:01PM, "Roxanne Darling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Sampling! Of course. And for established shows, that would be very doable > >and reliable, as you could even take some averages over the course of a > >month (For example # of comments per episode.) I do think this is something > >to propose to the Advertising Stds committee at ADM. I think it would be > >awesome to have something new and out of the box to consider and possibly > >help develop/deliver. > >Another plus is that it values people who have not pod-faded, and gives more > >than lip service to the point often raised about how important consistency > >is for connecting with your audience and putting your sponsors at ease. > > > >Being a math and measurement junkie, I can hardly wait to go rate our > >show...after the billables are done though. > > > >Aloha Friday! > > > >Rox > > > >On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Sheila English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > > > >> Hi Rox, > >> > >> I will be signing up for ADM. > >> > >> At this time my thought was to do "sampling". Determine what kind of > >> videos you want to sample using the rating system. > >> > >> For example - a new themed show, a new show, a show at 1 month, 3 > >> months, 6 months and 1 year. Since I have 12 production companies > >> that work for me, I would sample each person's work one time a month > >> or on some pre-determined schedule just to make sure everyone is > >> making the grade. Of course you need to determine what your baseline > >> rate will be in order to call it a success. > >> > >> If your pre determined acceptable rate for a video is, let's say, 50 > >> points with 15 or less being failure and 60 or more being considered > >> a great success your rates can fluxuate within a few standard > >> deviations over the course of time, but ultimately you can cancel > >> something that is consistantly under performing, or you know to spend > >> money on something that is getting 50-60 + ratings over a set period > >> of time. > >> > >> This just allows you to have a more scientific approach if you like > >> that sort of thing. I realize not everyone does. But, using a > >> scientific approach with baselines and performance history could tip > >> the scales in your favor with an investor or sponsor. > >> > >> Now that everyone's eyes have probably glazed over from bordom...LOL > >> > >> Standardizing a rating system that we can all, if not entirely agree > >> on, but agree to, would allow us a metrix system to help pitch for > >> finanical backing. > >> > >> Sheila > >> *who steps off the soap box and hands it back to Rox* > >> > >> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>, > >> "Roxanne Darling" <okekai@> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > Wow Sheila - you have done some serious thinking on this. One of > >> the things > >> > I like about it is the neutrality - yes, even detractors get credit > >> for > >> > being *engaged.* And since we tend to have very long and thoughtful > >> > comments on our episodes, I like the one point per word rating > >> too! :-) > >> > The main challenge I see is tracking all of this. We do a daily > >> show and I > >> > cannot keep up with the basic stats tracking. Have you thought of > >> how this > >> > might be implemented? > >> > > >> > It would be nice if something could be automated > >> > > >> > Are you a member ofADM? I would suggest you join and bring your > >> ideas over > >> > there. > >> > http://www.downloadablemedia.org > >> > > >> > Aloha, > >> > > >> > Rox > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Sheila English <sheila_clover@> > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I'm sure I'm not nearly as technically savvy as the majority of > >> > > people here. And I only have 2-3 years of doing online marketing > >> > > research or video distribution research. So, I would welcome any > >> > > feedback or suggestions on this idea of having a performance > >> rating > >> > > system. > >> > > I really need a useable rating system that would honestly reflect > >> > > video performance. > >> > > Here's what I got so far though. > >> > > > >> > > Proposed Rating System------- > >> > > > >> > > Video View = 1 point per view > >> > > > >> > > Video Comment = You get 2 points because there is a > >> > > comment. Then you get 1 point for every word written. > >> > > > >> > > Video Rating= 1 point. It does NOT matter if they > >> > > rated it good or bad, you still get the point. > >> > > > >> > > Video Download = 5 points per download. This applies > >> > > to downloading to desktop, iPod or similar device, > >> > > mobile phone, PDA, etc. > >> > > > >> > > Video Link= 2 points per link. This is the URL only. > >> > > > >> > > Video Embed = 5 points per video embed. If someone > >> > > puts your entire video on display on their site you > >> > > get 5 points. Don't forget to read any comments from > >> > > blogs about your video because those count as "video > >> > > comments"! > >> > > > >> > > Video Mash-up = 5 points. It doesn't matter if the > >> > > mash up is flattering or not. Someone went to a lot of > >> > > trouble to create something from your video. > >> > > > >> > > Video News Sites = 3 points if they simply send your > >> > > video to a site such as Digg or Technorati, 5 points > >> > > if they comment or write an article along with the > >> > > posted video. > >> > > > >> > > Video Media Pick Up = 5 points if the media pick up > >> > > your video and write about it. This includes industry > >> > > news, local, regional or national news. > >> > > > >> > > Video Specialty Site Pick Up = If you have an industry > >> > > site or specialty site request your video to display > >> > > that gets 10 points. For example, Borders or BNN are > >> > > industry sites. They must REQUEST it or pick it up > >> > > themselves to display, you cannot offer it to them. > >> > > These are NON-news sites. If you offer them the video > >> > > and they take it you get half points, 5 points if you > >> > > offer it as opposed to 10 points if they request it or > >> > > take it themselves. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Roxanne Darling > >> > "o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian > >> > Join us at the reef! Mermaid videos, geeks talking, and lots more > >> > http://reef.beachwalks.tv > >> > 808-384-5554 > >> > Video --> http://www.beachwalks.tv > >> > Company -- > http://www.barefeetstudios.com > >> > Twitter--> http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling > >> > > >> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Roxanne Darling > >"o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian > >Join us at the reef! Mermaid videos, geeks talking, and lots more > >http://reef.beachwalks.tv > >808-384-5554 > >Video --> http://www.beachwalks.tv > >Company -- > http://www.barefeetstudios.com > >Twitter--> http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling > > > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > >
