Rupert, I have had the same reaction.
In general I'm happy that there's one more device out there to help people join the ranks of shooting spontaneous video. Reliable sources have disassembled the new Touch and shown that there's a spot for a camera lens which supports the rumor (which Jobs has denied) that Apple had to pull the camera off the Touch due to technical problems. This sounds like the truth to me because who in their right bloody mind would exclude their top tier product from the latest premium feature? Apple is definitely having some issues right now, the current iPhone 3.1 software release is VERY bad - truly as bad as any crap ware that Microsoft has put out there. On a brighter note, I'm really glad to see Nokia finally pulling their finger out (the Nokia N900 with Maemo - http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/) and won't it be grand when there's a photo/video centric Android phone? /jules On Sep 28, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Rupert Howe wrote: > I just went to look at buying an iPod touch, thinking that it now had > a video camera. Because the iPhone does. > > Turns out it doesn't . Typical Apple WTF BS. > > But... wait for it... the new IPOD NANO *does*. WTF? BS. > > Anyway, the quality of the 640x480 H264 videos it shoots looks quite > impressive. The colours are quite vibrant and there's a whole bunch > of live video effects. Effects, I should add, that those stupid > bastards have deleted from iMovie. WTF? BS. > > You can see samples here: > http://www.apple.com/ipodnano/features/video-camera.html > > Would certainly be a very discreet little camcorder for capturing the > world around you. > > But really, though, Apple: WTF? > > BS > > Rupert > http://twittervlog.tv > > > --- Julian Seery Gude [email protected] {561} 584-9088 or {skype} exceler8 LOCALNa8ion.com and exceler8.com On the web: http://www.google.com/profiles/JulianSeeryGude [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
