Very much agree with Roxanne and what Jay just said. But for many of us
blogger-types, it gets sorta murky. For large blogs with multiple staff, or
for blogs like in Roxanne's example, where the blogger happens to be a
travel blogger on a trip ... that seems fairly clear-cut to me. It's a
business, you should disclose stuff.

But not all blogs are that type of blog. My main blog, for example - I
started out blogging about stuff I found interesting that was connected with
my job, more to remember the cool stuff I found than anything. It's morphed
into sort of a part-time job. I get speaking engagements because I blog.
Publishers sometimes send me techie books to look at. Etc.

I get it - it's a small business, and I make sure to say "hey, they sent me
a book" or whatever. But it's been a loooong trip between now and when I
started. I know a lot of bloggers that mix business and pleasure,
professional interests and family, and well - they're still in that murky
middle area where policies like the FTC is going after ... wouldn't even
dawn on them.

That, plus the fact that there are like a gazillion blogs out there, makes
this a hard thing to enforce, I think :-)

David Lee King
davidleeking.com - blog
davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog
twitter | skype: davidleeking


On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jay dedman <[email protected]> wrote:

> > What's the difference anyway?  We are NOT talking about limiting free
> speech
> > or regulating independent opinions. This rule is about regulating
> COMMERCIAL
> > speech or speech that has been influenced by commerce.
>
> Yep, good points. I originally laid out the fears/anger in the US over
> the FTC announcement. As we all know, people in US dont always base
> their arguments on facts. There is simply a knee-jerk reaction against
> the government getting involved in anything. Hell, poor rural
> americans would rather get eaten alive by cancer caused by processed
> food and pesticides than have the government offer healthcare.
>
> As Roxanne says, this rule is aimed at Commercial interactions online.
> If it stays like this, it'l be fine...just like the blogosphere is
> fine with laws against spam and child porn.
>
> It's good to show some muscle when the govt does anything. Makes them
> think twice. Now go buy some guns: http://www.auctionarms.com/
>
> Jay
>
>
> --
> http://ryanishungry.com
> http://jaydedman.com
> http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> 917 371 6790
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to