Hey - just the librarian in me showing it's ugly head :-)

David Lee King
davidleeking.com - blog
davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog
twitter | skype: davidleeking


On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Rupert Howe <rup...@twittervlog.tv> wrote:

> yes. search. the way most people navigate the web. and what i do for a
> living. oops.
> you're right.
> both is a good way to go, i guess... :)
>
> On 22-Oct-09, at 1:20 PM, David King wrote:
>
> > It's just a slightly easier way to keep track of things that
> > happened that
> > year. So if there are 3-4 years of navlopomo, and you search for
> > that tag,
> > you get everything. But if you search for navlopomo09, you would
> > just find
> > the stuff happening in 2009 (assuming eeryone used the tag).
> >
> > I'm ambivalent - heck, use BOTH tags, and you're covered both ways!
> >
> > David Lee King
> > davidleeking.com - blog
> > davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog
> > twitter | skype: davidleeking
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Rupert Howe <rup...@twittervlog.tv>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm confused about the whole adding-the-year-onto-everything thing.
> > > my twitter stream is full of weird conference abbreviations with
> > 09 at
> > > the end.
> > > seems to me that the things being tagged in Navlopomo will have
> > their
> > > own dates anyway - whether videos or blog posts.
> > > and it's already a long word.
> > > can we not just do navlopomo as the tag and #navlopomo as the
> > hashtag?
> > > am i missing a scenario in which the 09 is vital, or is it a case of
> > > it conforming with good tag standards...?
> > >
> > > On 22-Oct-09, at 2:03 AM, David King wrote:
> > >
> > > > Navlopomo09
> > > >
> > > > David Lee King
> > > > davidleeking.com - blog
> > > > davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog
> > > > twitter | skype: davidleeking
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Jay dedman <jay.ded...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > which tag are we going to use?
> > > > >
> > > > > Navlopomo
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to