If you go with open, my preference would be for NON-integration with books.  I 
realize there are multiple reasons for contemplating a move from closed to open 
stacks -- could be space concerns; could be a desire to increase use - but if 
usage IS part of the equation, then you really would want to consider the ease 
of browsing.  Browsability is a nice, nice thing with DVDs that are housed all 
together.  It sounds, though, as if increasing usage may not be what's driving 
your institution's push towards open stacks, since you've not allowed student 
checkout beyond the building?  We're different in that we allow students a 
7-day checkout period on all video materials which are not currently on 
classroom reserve, with item recall available should something be needed by a 
prof.

When Gary responds, it'll be a with a very different POV from ours, I'm sure. J

Susan Albrecht
Wabash College


From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seay, Jared Alexander
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 2:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Videolib] Videos shelved separate or integrated into the stacks?

Hello,

I know this issue has been brought up on this list before, but the whole idea 
of videos in open stacks (integrated with the regular book collection) vs. a 
separate video collection (in open or closed stacks) is coming up at our 
library with a vengeance.  I would like to get a test of the waters among those 
on this list about what your library does, does it work, and what would make it 
better.  Certainly both horror stores as well as happy sunshine stores would be 
appreciated.

For the record my situation is thus:   We are the academic library for the 
College of Charleston (about 11,000 students). We have about 8000 videos (VHS 
and DVD) in our separate, closed stack collection.  We only circulate to 
faculty (3 days).  Reserve videos for faculty are at the circulation desk.  
Students must view videos in library only.  To add to the complication, we 
recently concluded an agreement with our Student Government Association (SGA) 
to create an SGA funded collection of "popular" video titles that would be 
circulated (3 days) to students only.   This collection would be located on 
shelves near the circulation desk near our browsing books.  We are in the 
process of ordering titles now.

What are your thoughts?  Beyond what your library actually does, what do you 
(philosophically) THINK and FEEL is the "best" approach to making a Media 
Collection available to faculty and students?  Is spreading the videos 
throughout the regular collection a good thing?   Is a separate video 
collection a good thing?  Many variables exist (open/closed stacks, partial 
integration, partial circulation etc.).  'll gladly allow myself to be directed 
to any good articles or links on the subject too.  Thanks.

Jared

PS:  I just found a good article from Library Trends (Winter 2010) on the 
subject (that I have not read yet):
"Making the Most of Your Video Collection: Trends in Patron Access and Resource 
Sharing" by Barbara Bergman of Minnesota State University"



Jared Alexander Seay
Reference Librarian
Head, Media Collections
Addlestone Library
College of Charleston
Charleston SC 29424

Main Office:           843-953-1428       
blogs.cofc.edu/seayj/<http://blogs.cofc.edu/seayj/>
Media Collections: 843-953-8040       blogs.cofc.edu/media 
collections<http://blogs.cofc.edu/mediacollections/>

Addlestone Report:    
blogs.cofc.edu/addlestonereport<http://blogs.cofc.edu/addlestonereport/>
Reference Services:  blogs.cofc.edu/refblog<http://blogs.cofc.edu/refblog/>






VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to