Jane Hutchison and deg farrelly attended the symposium "Copyright Exceptions 
for Libraries in the Digital Age: Section 108 Reform" on Friday, February 8th 
at Columbia Law School presented in cooperation with the US Copyright Office.

Panelists and attendees consisted primarily of attorneys, publishers and 
librarians.  Notable panelists included Maria Pallante (U.S. Register of 
Copyrights), Richard Rudnick (General Counsel John Wiley & Sons), Laura Gasaway 
(University of North Carolina School of Law), Mark Seeley (Elsevier) Kenneth 
Crews (Columbia University), Jonathan Band, and Paul Aiken (Authors Guild).  
The symposium consisted of four sessions:

1)  The Legal Landscape
2)  Section 108 Issues other than Mass Digitization
3)  To What Extent Should Libraries be Permitted to Engage in Mass Digitization 
of Published Works and for What Purposes, and
4)  What Should be the Conditions on Libraries Digitizing, Maintaining and 
Making Available Copyrighted Works.

Several panelists participated in the 2005 Study Group on 108 that made 
specific recommendations and conclusions for further discussion.  Those 
recommendations are available here:  
http://www.section108.gov/docs/Sec108StudyGroupReport.pdf.

The options presented to the audience was whether 108 should be kept as it, 
repealed or reformed.  There was obviously no agreement across the panelists or 
the audience.  Jonathan Band posited that reopening 108 to legislative action 
is a danger considering the current state of affairs with the legislators and 
lobbyists and could result in losing or severely limiting the protections that 
libraries already have with Section 108.  Others felt that the 2005 Study 
Group's recommendations should be considered and perhaps extended.

Howard Besser said that the US Copyright Office should consider the Mellon 
Foundations Videos at Risk project and that a national database of "orphan 
videos" would be advantageous so that each library doesn't have to perform a 
comprehensive search.

Jane Ginsburg at Columbia Law School updated the audience on international 
movements regarding orphan works and mass digitization.  France developed a 
formula for orphan works that gave authors and publishers the right to opt-out. 
 In addition others, such as Laura Gasaway discussed preserving web sites and 
streaming of TV News as well as the right to make digital copies of ILL 
articles.

A librarian brought up the issue of eBooks and the fact that library 
collections are shrinking and that preservation is and will be a problem if 
libraries don't own the works.  Specific examples of this issue include the 
soundtrack to the film Up, and the Netflix series House of Cards both of which 
do not exist in tangible hard copy. Two issues emerged from orphan works:  
preservation and access.  Who and how will it be carried.  It was agreed that 
it is an expensive undertaking to digitize works and that libraries would not 
go to the extent unless the item was considered worth their while to preserve.

Brandon Butler mentioned the Code of Best Practices for Fair Use in Academic 
and Research Libraries as one way to follow a community of users in making 
copies and preserving works.  Kenneth Crews, one of the panelists stated that 
there is an illusion of balance with certainty and that uncertainty is always 
an element.  Therefore one should nurture a robust fair use.

We believe the Library of Congress and the Copyright Office face a difficult 
task deciding whether to follow the 2005 Study Group and reform Section 108 or 
leave it be, and in the hands of the community of users and court cases to 
decide future interpretation of Section 108.


Jane B. Hutchison
Associate Director
Instruction & Research Technology
300 Pompton Road
Wayne, NJ 07470
(w)973-720-2980
(cell) 973-418-7727

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to