Hi, > I have noticed that the function : > > scaled_rank_1_update > > performs A += alpha x.y' , which is (correct me if I'm wrong) not really > a rank-1 update when x!=y . Wouldn't it be more reasonable to conform > the BLAS standard : > scaled_rank_1_update : A+=alpha x.x', > scaled_rank_2_update : A+=alpha (x.y' + y.x'), > outer_prod : A = x.y' > ?
Since this is only internal naming, I really don't mind. A += alpha x * y' still is a rank-1-update, it's just not a symmetric one. Best regards, Karli ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ ViennaCL-devel mailing list ViennaCL-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viennacl-devel
