Kyle Farrell writes: > For better or worse, I'm trying to get my attribution format to match > Outlook (sorry!).
Hi Kyle, what is the Outlook attribution format? > I can nearly get it, but one thing that seems > missing is differentiating "To" and "CC" receipients. The "%T" format > contains all recipients: > > T - full names of the recipients of the message, in a comma-separated list > If a full name cannot be found, the corresponding address is used > instead. > > Using this the attribution is incorrect since I'd list all recipients > as "To:". Is there a format to get only "To" and only "CC" > recipients? I think the original design of the specifiers was probably not ideal. If you can look through the manual section on the Summary Format and suggest a solution, I can implement it. Cheers, Uday
