Kyle Farrell writes: > First off, here is the Outlook attribution format: > > From: [author name] > Sent: [date] > To: [to field recipient full names, semi-colon separated] > Cc: [if any CC recipient full names, semi-colon separated] > Subject: [subject] > > I can get pretty close to that with: > (setq vm-included-text-attribution-format "\n:From: %F\nSent: %w, %m %d, %y > %h\nTo: %T\nSubject: %s\n\n")
The included-text-attribution-format was never meant for producing elaborate headers. Why don't you use vm-included-text-headers, which is what is meant for doing this kind of thing? In any case, in the trunk version of VM, I have stripped out the CC recipients from %t and %T specifiers, and added new specifiers %r and %R for all recipients. There are independent reasons for doing this change. (I think that in the old days, there weren't enough fields in the cached data header to keep 'to' recipients separately. It was an unnecessary limitation.) Cheers, Uday
