"Thomas Jakobsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As Martin points out, it will be inconvenient or impossible to > parameterize some tests like this. But for others, it will be just > as easy, and in these cases we get a lot of extra testing for "free" > by doing it, since it will enable us to run them with many > parameters.
We just have to remember to be very careful with the random seeds used in these tests -- we must be able to reproduce the tests exactly. But if we get that right, I think random testing would be great way to expand the scope of the current tests to make sure that everything still holds together with more players, larger threshold, etc. -- Martin Geisler _______________________________________________ viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/) [email protected] http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk
