Ivan Damgard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi everybody!
> About Claudio's latest proposal: I agree that this seems to be the > natural solution given two parties and a homomorphic encryption > scheme. Okay, great -- I've started implementing the improved version while I was back in Denmark, but I got away from it again. I hope it will be ready this week. Mikkel: can you make some comments and unit tests for the Paillier code you wrote? You can simply save and do 'hg import' on this mail (including headers and all): http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cryptography.viff.patches/11/raw Then make a new commit and mail it to viff-patches. I'll then integrate it in the patch series. I think that is the suggested work flow, but I have no real experience yet, so I guess I'll have to ask the Mercurial guys if there is a better way... > As the homomorphic encryption scheme it would be interesting to try > the scheme from mine, Martin's and Mikkel's paper. This would have > to be the variant we propose for MPC where the order of one of the > elements in the public key is a 2-power times a prime. It should be > significantly faster than Paillier, although it is not clear how to > make it actively secure in a really efficient way. Yeah, that would be an interesting next step! -- Martin Geisler _______________________________________________ viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/) [email protected] http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk
