[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


This problem was reported for Windows vim and fixed in the patch ~month ago.

But what is 7.0.262 ? Isn't ~ 158 the last patch number for vim7 ?

Yakov

I've just tested with the last version and it works quite well. Sorry to have bothered you with an already corrected bug.

Anyway, even with the latest release installed, the version displayed by windows is still 7.0.262.0.

Best regards,
Mike Meirsman

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.



I don't know where that 4-part version number comes from. 262 can be interpreted as 262d, 106h, 406o, ^F^A (the latter assumes one little-endian word),... none of which rings any bells with me.

The "official" way to display the version number and patch level of any Vim executable is (at the user's choice) any one of the following:

        vim --version |more
                Version number is displayed on the first line of output
                and "Included patches" (if any) on second line.
                Note: In Win32, "gvim --version" sends its output to a message
                popup, apparently after detaching Vim from the shell's stdout
                (if any) but without starting the GUI.

        launch [g]vim without any editfile. The splash screen comes up, unless
                the vimrc or some command-line switch sets the I flag in the
                'shortmess' option.
                Version and patchlevel are on the second non-blank line.

        :intro
                The splash screen comes up. Version & pl on 2nd nonblank line.

        :version
                The version listing comes up. Version on 1st line,
                included patches (if any) on 2nd.


Best regards,
Tony.

Reply via email to