scott wrote:
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 15:32, you wrote:
Mr Toothpik wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me
up to 7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something
extra that had to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a
directory or something
now i've got the beta i feel committed, and will commence chasing
after the errors it spews from
/usr/local/share/vim/vim71a/filetype.vim
when i run it -- apparently the install created the 71a directory for me
What errors?
i'm sorry bram, i didn't write them down, i didn't save the
buggy 'filetype.vim', i just fixed it -- my bad -- but it was obvious there
was an uncommitted patch or something -- there were >>>>>>>> and
<<<<<<<<< in it in two places
they were syntax errors, and the comments around the >>>>>>><<<<<<<
were something to do with "mine" and "r263", as memory serves
they were replacing "coronary" with "coronaryRespite" or whatever that thread
was
sc
from a recent thread on (IIRC) vim-dev, I'd guess "conary" and "conaryrecipe"
or maybe "conaryRecipe".
Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
222. You send more than 20 personal e-mails a day.
