Thank you all for the insight. I find the suggestions on here helpful :)
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Alessandro Pezzoni <
alessandro_pezz...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 19:33, Mike Richman <rich...@umd.edu> wrote:
>
> > " mappings for frame, block, and columns environments
> > call IMAP ('EBFE', s:undostring."\\begin{frame}\<cr>{<++>}\<cr>"
> > \ . "<++>\<cr>\\end{frame}<++>", 'tex')
> > call IMAP ('EBBL', s:undostring."\\begin{block}{<++>}\<cr>"
> > \ . "<++>\<cr>\\end{block}<++>", 'tex')
> > call IMAP ('EBCO', s:undostring."\\begin{columns}\<cr>"
> > \ . "\\column{.5\\textwidth}\<cr>"
> > \ . "<++>\<cr>\\end{columns}<++>", 'tex')
> >
> > " this causes frames to be folded. sometimes the parsing goes poorly
> > " and a bunch of extraneous folds are added, but it's still nice to
> > " fully fold and unfold the frames using zC and zO.
> > let Tex_FoldedEnvironments = 'verbatim,comment,frame,eq,gather,align,'
> >
> \.'figure,table,thebibliography,keywords,abstract,'
> > \.'titlepage'
>
> Yes, although something like:
>
> let g:Tex_Env_frame =
> \\begin{frame}\<cr>{<++>}\<cr><++>\<cr>\\end{frame}<++>"
> call IMAP('EBFE', "\<C-r>=Tex_PutEnvironment('frame')\<cr>", 'tex')
>
> (and similarly for the others) feels cleaner. Just my 2c.
>
> Alessandro
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Vim-latex-devel mailing list
Vim-latex-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel
