A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
>
> Akria Sheng wrote:
>>
>> A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
>>> Akria Sheng wrote:
>>>> I have got one error to crash vim.
>>>> It happened when meet the following condition:
>>>> A. must in Linux(solaris and winxp is OK)
>>>> B. vim7.0(6.4 is ok)
>>>> C. open one huge file(exceed 368710 bytes) then type ":sp ./"
>>>>
>>>> In general, it will split one window to show the filebrowse.
>>>> But Vim will crash.
>>>> I don't know how to avoid this crash.
>>>>
>>>> There are two appendixed report file:
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/user-files/235811/bugreport.txt bugreport.txt
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/user-files/235812/buginfo.txt buginfo.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Do you see it every time? On this Linux box I have here one Vim session
>>> with a file of more than a million /lines/, 33.6 MB (almost 100 times as
>>> big as yours: a modified version of Unihan.txt from the Unicode site). I
>>> did ":sp ./" and gvim opened a netrw window on my current directory with
>>> no prob. And yet, I have a somewhat fancier installation than you do,
>>> what with a GNOME2 GUI, a few user scripts, a color scheme... But I have
>>> 1GB of live RAM and my CPU is an AMD running at 1.2 GHz (not that gvim
>>> uses it all, X and Firefox have the biggest memory allocations, and
>>> Firefox is also the most greedy of my CPU time). Also, I'm 76 bugfixes
>>> ahead of you. (Yours is 7.0.000.) Maybe you should apply the 76 patches
>>> published so far (at ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.0/ ) and see if
>>> the problem recurs? See at (ftp: or)
>>> http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.0/README what these patches are all
>>> about.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tony.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I have already do the same test on vim with 76 patches, but it still
>> happened every time.
>> I have generate another big file for test, and it has the same error.
>> The vim70 on solaris is complied with the same complie-option and this
>> has
>> no error.
>>
>> I try to test the script of vim, and found the script
>> "runtime/autoload/netrw.vim#4240,4242" is involved.
>> If I comment the two lines, Vim will not crash.
>> But I have no sense about this modification.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Akria Sheng
>
> Which version of netrw are you using? In mine (version 102 dated Jul 24,
> 2006 as shown near the top of the file), lines 4240 to 4242 are one
> blank line and two comments, of which the first one is just a horizontal
> line and the other is the fold header for the function
> NetrwStatusLine(). The version of netrw distributed with Vim is not
> always the latest one. Later versions are usually available at
> vim-online http://vim.sourceforge.net/ and even more recent ones on Dr.
> Chip's personal site http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim
>
>
> Best regards,
> Tony.
>
>
Dear Tony,
I have update the netrw to version 102, but it still happened.
The two line are changed to be 4424 & 4426.
When I comment the two line again, vim open the fileexplorer success.
Best regards,
Akria Sheng
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I-have-got-one-%22ml_get%22-error-tf2194557.html#a6075633
Sent from the Vim - General forum at Nabble.com.
