On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:21:06 +0200
Mikolaj Machowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You point can be split in two: 
> 1. Intellisense plugin is tied to widget system. It could mean that
>    popup system had to be written each time for each GUI. Monstrous
>    effort for writing and maintaining.

I dont want MS intellisense, I just want an improved omnicompletion :-) 

> 2. Info provided by intellisense can be provided by current
>    implementation of omnicompletion. Problem is efficiency and size of
>    data. For example inclusion of built-in functions in PHP
>    omnicompletion caused that phpcomplete.vim has almost 300K. Adding
>    help would easily explode that file to few M [1]. Parsing of
> PHPdoc is also possible but it could take time (phpcomplete is already
>    sluggish).

Well it is posssible in other editors with a reasonable speed (even in
Java based editors like IntelliJ Idea), so it must be possible to do
natively in vim too. A large modification - probably, but I am sure
that will be af great help for many programmers using Vim. 

-- 
Kim Schulz    | Private :  http://www.schulz.dk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Business:  http://www.devteam.dk
+45 5190 4262 | Sparetime: http://www.fundanemt.com

Reply via email to