On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:00:30 -0600 (CST), "Tom Purl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, March 6, 2007 2:34 pm, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote: > > Finally, on the subject of converting the comments - it is entirely a > > manual process, that can not be automated. Comments need to be > > integrated into the body of the main tip (maybe the tip needs to be > > adjusted, reworded, etc). We should just push out the existing pages, > > and then set to work on reworking the tips by hand. Eventually we'll > > be done. [snip] > So I guess what I'm saying is, what's wrong with waiting for "the > community" to refactor these tips using guidelines from the wikibook > admins?
Sorry, was not clear. That's what I am arguing for as well. I am not saying "let's have admins do all the work before the site goes live". I am saying let's leave things the way they are, provide a template, and slowly set about refactoring tips (encouraging users to do the same). I haven't checked, but if there is a wikipedia-style "this page still needs your attention" notification that can be placed on the page, we could do that as well. so, i propose we move to agreeing what the format should be. -denis
