John Beckett wrote:
Brian McKee wrote:
One of the first things I was thinking about mirrors the above comments.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Talk:Learning_the_vi_editor/Vim/
TipsSandbox/Tip_1:_the_super_star has a bunch of "thanks for the
great tip!" type comments with more useage info interspersed. I
think those 'great tip' comments go to a separate page, while the
'use # or % instead' kind of comments need to be edited into the
actual tip itself.
But why keep the 'great tip' comments?
The friendly atmosphere of the current Vim Tips web site is rather
nice, but why put all the work of moving it to a wiki unless you
make the tips more helpful?
Unhelpful tips and unhelpful comments should be omitted.
John
Moving the tip body to a wiki page and the comments to its talk page can
(IIUC) be automated. /Then/ the tip author (or maintainer, etc.) can archive
the talk page, remove empty comments (of the "great tip" kind), refactor
useful comments into the tip body, etc.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
43rd Law of Computing:
Anything that can go wr
fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core dumped
