Thomas Michael Engelke wrote:

> But that's arguing semantics when the core of the problem is known
> now. I apologize for having a different set of mind and not
> understanding the problem instantly.

This is not a fair remark, considering I pointed out to you, privately,
that he made the statement fairly clearly before his last post, which is
why he said it all-caps/bold the second time around.

It's not that you didn't understand the problem instantly: the problem
was explained fairly clearly; it's that you made him repeat his answers,
indicating that you hadn't read them.

-- 
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer...
http://micah.cowan.name/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to