Thomas Michael Engelke wrote:
> 2007/5/15, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Thomas Michael Engelke wrote:
>>
>> > But that's arguing semantics when the core of the problem is known
>> > now. I apologize for having a different set of mind and not
>> > understanding the problem instantly.
>>
>> This is not a fair remark, considering I pointed out to you, privately,
>> that he made the statement fairly clearly before his last post, which is
>> why he said it all-caps/bold the second time around.
>>
>> It's not that you didn't understand the problem instantly: the problem
>> was explained fairly clearly; it's that you made him repeat his answers,
>> indicating that you hadn't read them.
> 
> Damn. I apologize again, this time for replying your mail on the list.
> Now I know why there was no "Reply to all", which I thought to be a
> glitch in GMail.

Oh. Well, I actually hadn't noticed you'd done that, believe it or not.
And I don't mind.

-- 
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer...
http://micah.cowan.name/


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to