The screen is not redrawn then, thus you have to use
CTRL-L or ":redraw!" if the command did display something.
I do not think this paragraph can be interpreted ambiguously.
The first part - "The screen is not redrawn then" - I see it as
information not operational, it does not contradict the second part.
The second part is operational. It instructs the user
when to use Ctrl-L and when not to use Ctrl-L:
You have to use Ctrl-L(or :redraw!) *IF* the command did display
something.
Do you interpret the above phrase differently than me ?
The problem with this instruction, it is incorrect.
Yakov
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
