Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> > > When at the end of a buffer, daw on one space won't delete anything.
> > > Not that I think this is expected behavior, but this might be
> > > intentional (that is, failing to select any word after the cursor,
> > > nothing is done.).  However, when at the end of a buffer, daw on two
> > > spaces moves the cursor to be between the two spaces.  That can
> > > certainly not be intentional.
> 
> > It appears to work fine for me.  Please give us a reproducable example,
> > starting with "vim -u NONE".
> 
> % vim -u NONE
> i<Space><Space><Esc>0daw
> 
> Patches 1-123.

Eh, this way there is only white space, no word.  So I think it's OK
that "daw" fails.  "daw" only deletes a word under or after the cursor.
Not sure about the cursor moving.  Don't think this is important.

-- 
The difference between theory and practice, is that in theory, there
is no difference between theory and practice.

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\        download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui