On Nov 20, 2007 8:57 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nikolai Weibull wrote: > > > > > When at the end of a buffer, daw on one space won't delete anything. > > > > Not that I think this is expected behavior, but this might be > > > > intentional (that is, failing to select any word after the cursor, > > > > nothing is done.). However, when at the end of a buffer, daw on two > > > > spaces moves the cursor to be between the two spaces. That can > > > > certainly not be intentional. > > > > > It appears to work fine for me. Please give us a reproducable example, > > > starting with "vim -u NONE". > > > > % vim -u NONE > > i<Space><Space><Esc>0daw > > > > Patches 1-123. > > Eh, this way there is only white space, no word. So I think it's OK > that "daw" fails. "daw" only deletes a word under or after the cursor. > Not sure about the cursor moving. Don't think this is important.
Yes, that's what I described. However, the cursor moving is a bug. Not that it's harmful in any way, but do you really want to force future Vim-reimplementations to exhibit this behavior? Think of all the bugs in Vi that we now have to consider features. I won't push it any further, though. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
