Ben Schmidt wrote: >> I would add that the copy I have here, which has it too, is dated June >> 9, 2006 according to its line 4 (not its directory timestamp, which >> might reflect the date when I downloaded it). So the fix is at least one >> and a half years old (if I take into account the unequal lengths of the >> months). > > Is Vim 7.1 that old? 'Cause the fix definitely wasn't in the runtime files > distributed with it. Most likely the fix was made without a date change as it > was > such a minor fix. > > Ben.
According to its ":version" text, Vim 7.1 dates back to 12 May 2007. Since most runtime files are not reflected in the official patches, I don't expect to be able to find it in the official 7.1 patches (which I have on my HD). I would have thought the "Last Change" line reflected the latest (even minor) change but if you say the runtimes distributed with 7.1.0 didn't have it I'll have to assume that whoever added that exclamation mark forgot to update the "Last Change" line when he did it (I could check the archive but I'm too lazy ;-) ). Best regards, Tony. -- Trying to establish voice contact ... please _yell_ into keyboard. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
