> I would add that the copy I have here, which has it too, is dated June > 9, 2006 according to its line 4 (not its directory timestamp, which > might reflect the date when I downloaded it). So the fix is at least one > and a half years old (if I take into account the unequal lengths of the > months).
Is Vim 7.1 that old? 'Cause the fix definitely wasn't in the runtime files distributed with it. Most likely the fix was made without a date change as it was such a minor fix. Ben. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
