On Dec 20, 2007 11:44 PM, Matt Wozniski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > So, I've reworked the patch to support, in addition to the > xterm-compatible palette, Eterm and Konsole's palettes. Which palette > is used for the matching is controlled by a new option, 'termpalette' > (short name 'tpal'). If the option is unset, I default to an xterm > palette, but display a warning that color matching might be > unaccurate. > > For those interested, a comparison between the 3 palettes that I've > found so far can be seen here: > http://www.cs.drexel.edu/~mjw452/256.html > > So, I'd appreciate comments. The reworked patch can be found: > http://www.cs.drexel.edu/~mjw452/ctermrgb-src.diff (source, against SVN) > http://www.cs.drexel.edu/~mjw452/ctermrgb-runtime.diff (runtime, > against latest AAP) > > And, the two modified colorschemes for testing are available at > http://www.cs.drexel.edu/~mjw452/brookstream-rgb.vim and > http://www.cs.drexel.edu/~mjw452/autumnleaf-rgb.vim ; it should be > trivial to modify other colorschemes in this way. > > Please comment! > ~Matt
Has anyone tried this out? I would love to have some feedback on this, since I think that it would be a really nice feature to make life easier for colorscheme authors! ~Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
