On 20/02/2008, Richard Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:21 AM, George V. Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > The same caveats apply on Windows, which wasn't clear in Bram's help > text. > > > I assumed Bram counted Windows towards DOS, thus not offering a PID at > all?
I'm sure Bram knows better than that. 16-bit DOS has no form of multitasking, so a PID would be meaningless. But even Win16 has multiple processes. -- /George V. Reilly http://www.georgevreilly.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
